Suicide finding too quick, Stanford student's father saysBy Jessie Mangaliman, Lisa M. Krieger and Brandon Bailey
SAN DIEGO - Stanford doctoral student May Zhou was updating her résumé and on track to a brilliant career. So her grief-stricken family and friends say they are floored by the idea that she would take her own life. But one day after the body of the missing electrical engineering student was discovered in the trunk of her car, authorities were not backing away from their suggestion that Zhou, 23, may have committed suicide.
A two-hour autopsy conducted Friday identified ``no outward signs of foul play,'' according to police in Santa Rosa, where Zhou's car was found Thursday in a junior college parking lot. Authorities offered no further details, saying it could take a month to complete lab tests and make a final ruling on whether Zhou's death was suicide. And there was no explanation of how Zhou's car ended up 90 miles north of Stanford.
The news baffled the woman's father and classmates.
``No, no, no. No issues. She was strong,'' said her father, Yitong Zhou, who planned to help her revise her résumé the weekend she disappeared. ``If you're thinking about your résumé, why would you be thinking about suicide? I don't believe it. I don't believe it.''
Complaining that police seemed too quick to reach a conclusion about his daughter's death, Zhou said he had only recently learned that she conducted some online banking transactions shortly before she left her apartment Saturday. The transactions were ``unusual,'' he said, because of the amount. He declined to elaborate.
``I'm not saying it's foul play. What I'm saying is I want to keep an open mind,'' he said. Mengyao ``May'' Zhou was last seen by her roommate at Stanford on Saturday, before she left their graduate-student housing complex to run errands. The roommate, who has not made any public statements this week, reported Zhou missing to police after she had not come home by Sunday. Police said it appeared Zhou's car had been sitting in a parking lot at Santa Rosa Junior College for several days before it was found.
Zhou had missed class on the Thursday before she disappeared, said friend Chris Tsun Kit Ng. But when he saw her in class Tuesday, ``she seemed normal,'' he said. ``Everything seemed fine.''Yitong Zhou said he had been busy with work when his daughter called last week about modifying her résumé to apply for a summer internship, but they agreed to work on it over the weekend. His family's usual routine was to talk with her on Sunday evenings, after she had finished her studies, Yitong Zhou said. So on Sunday after 6 p.m., he dialed her cell phone, but got her voice mail.
``Usually, she calls right away,'' he said. ``I waited. Then I got a little bit worried because she's never done that before.''About 1:30 a.m. Monday, her father said, he got a call from Stanford police. ``They said, `Your daughter is missing,' '' he said. ``I didn't know what to think. She's not home and she's in the middle of the quarter at school.''Zhou said he tried her cell phone again. Again, his call went straight to voice mail.
He sent her e-mail: ``Where are you?''
``Nothing,'' he said.
As a second-year student in Stanford's electrical engineering doctoral program, Zhou had made it past the most stressful part of the program. She was at a point when many doctoral students feel they can relax a little -- although what creates anxiety varies among students, said Stanford graduate students and faculty.
``She was someone who was very organized, very upbeat, who could handle stress. She had friends,'' said Xiaoging Zhu, 27, a sixth-year graduate student who was Zhou's roommate last year. Zhou had been recruited to Stanford from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; In high school, her SAT scores had been perfect.
And she had already cleared one big hurdle: passing her qualifying exams. She did well and reportedly had been approached by several researchers interested in having her join their team. A second hurdle -- finding a research supervisor, who advises students -- was yet to come, but there was no rush. ``Finding a supervisor can be a source of stress,'' said Bruce A. Wooley, chairman of the Department of Electrical Engineering at Stanford. ``But May had no issues. She had time, and she was doing very well.''
Having secured three patents during her three summer internships at Qualcomm, ``she was the kind of student who could work independently -- progressing and then taking off,'' he said. Wooley said he knew of nothing that would have prompted suicide. ``There was nothing going on, academically, that would suggest a problem.''
Zhou's father, meanwhile, said he had many questions. ``There is nothing to indicate to me that my daughter would hurt herself,'' he said. ``And how, how did she get herself in the trunk of that car? It's a small trunk.'' The woman's parents and high school-age sister live in Sorrento Valley, a suburban neighborhood north of downtown San Diego. Yitong Zhou, an immigrant from China, declined to discuss his daughter's life in San Diego. But he seemed exhausted from the strain of his grief. ``I am so upset,'' he added. ``Last night I had no sleep. Nightmares.''
The family lives in a two-story sand-colored stucco house with a two-car garage and a wide driveway, on a blocklong cul-de-sac. The neighborhood is in an area dotted by high-tech companies. Qualcomm, where May Zhou worked, is two miles from the home she grew up in. School officials had identified Zhou as a promising student from the time she was in second grade, said La Jolla High School Principal Dana Shelburne. As one of the district's most academically talented kids, she had the right to choose which high school she attended. She chose La Jolla, 17 miles from home. The school has an ethnically diverse student body and a reputation for high academic standards.
Martin Teachworth, the school's science team coach, first met Zhou in ninth grade. She made a lasting impression. ``When I marked her work, I had to double-check myself to make sure I didn't get it wrong,'' Teachworth said. ``She seemed to have her act together. She would drive herself. She always knew what she wanted to do.''
Zhou attended some social functions with other students, but usually only those at school, Teachworth said, adding ``I can only imagine the pressure she was under, academically.'' But others rejected that notion.
``I do not think it related to academics,'' said Zhu, her former roommate.
``I don't believe it,'' said her father, ``because I'm a parent. I know her. I don't think this is what she would do.''
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 comments:
May not be sucide.
Group Psychological Harassment AKA gang stalking – Modern organized crime.
Commented by a Student victim at CCSF
The following points have been summarized from:
Terrorist Stalking in America
by David Arthur Lawson*
Copyright © Scrambling News 2001
Conclusion: Harassment group are hire criminals by mostly private investigators to destroy adversaries on behave of their clients. They use smear campaign on victim wherever they go; work, school, social gathering (mainly on new acquaintances) those that the victims know well enough are being used in other ways, either by lying or some uncomfortable sensitive issue about the victim. In hopes to create a negative response from the victim to distance themselves from friends and acquaintances. Constant vandalism and psychological-sensitizing as a mean to destroy the victim financially and emotionally. The intent is to push the victim into suicide or murder.
Frequently Asked Questions:
1.Who is behind the stalking groups?
2.Who is considered a threat to a corporation or industry?
3.What are these groups?
4.How are the groups financed?
5.Who are the leaders?
6.What do the group leaders get out of it?
7.Who are the members?
8.What do the group members get out of it?
9.What is the psychology behind all this?
10.Who do groups target?
11.What purpose does the target serve to the group?
12.How are targets identified?
13.What are the group’s objectives?
14.How do they achieve their objectives?
15.How long does it last?
16.How do the groups sensitize the target?
17.What other tactics are used?
18.More on occupying a target’s time
19.Audio Surveillance
20.Some Important Points
21.What about the Police?
22.The Use of “Coercive Persuasion” to control cult members
23.Internet Newsgroups/Forums
24.U.S. Department of Justice defines “Vengeance/Terrorism Stalking”
1. Who is behind the stalking groups?
I.Corporations:
Groups are used by corporations use to stalk their enemies or potential enemies. (19)
II.Organized crime:
Many groups have links to convicted criminals, and associations with organized crime. (24)
Back to Top
2. Who is considered a threat to a corporation or industry?
Whistleblowers (19)
Activists (19)
Back to Top
3. What are these groups?(47)
a.They are private armies.
b.They are primarily criminal groups.
c.They have their own targets which are connected to their political agenda.
d.They are also available for hire, to corporations and other entities, to destroy or neutralize people.
e.They have the power to destroy lives.
Back to Top
4. How are the groups financed?
Groups are well financed by: (7)
i.Corporations (19)
ii.Other criminal groups (35)
iii.Committing crimes such as: robbery, theft and drug trafficking
iv.Business owner to control competition.
v.Personal service for the wealthy; mistress protection, divorce cases,
vi.Some targets are a source of corporate revenue (24)
Groups are operated as businesses (47)
The sole financial beneficiaries are the leaders (35)
Back to Top
5. Who are the leaders?
Leaders pretend that they are larger than life characters, with heroic backgrounds.
They are looked upon with reverence by their followers.
Typically, their backgrounds and alleged heroism cannot be independently verified, because it allegedly involves national security. – read www.utne.com “corporate spook” – former FBI, CIA and other top government officials working in the private “investigative sector”.
Leaders pretend that their groups are committed to bringing about some change. – community policing program.
In general, group leaders remain isolated from the activities of their followers. (16)
Leaders do not meet privately with group members. (16)
Back to Top
6. What do the group leaders get out of it?
Financial power and/or
Political power
Back to Top
7. Who are the members?
Right-wing extremist groups (eg. World Church of the Creator (WCOTC) and the Aryan Nations) (9)
Left-wing extremist groups (9)
Special interest extremists: (11)
animal rights
pro-life
environmental
anti-nuclear
Because their individual membership is quite small, extremist groups tend to network locally. They’re made up of a combination of some people from many different groups in an area. (9)
Groups cloak their true identities by posing as: (23)
citizens groups – neiborhood watch
clubs
churches – extreme groups – not affiliated with any major religious groups.
Back to Top
8. What do the group members get out of it? (15)
They believe they are fulfilling the ‘higher purpose’ of the group, even though they may only have a general idea of the ideology of the group.
They are having fun with their friends, and that fun involves stalking and harassing various targets and engaging in other civil disobedience.
The people who are attracted to groups which engage in cause stalking are those who feel powerless, inferior and angry. They are empowered by the group.
Back to Top
9. What is the psychology behind all this?
I.This is a game:(36-37)
Groups are rallied by the constant “victories” they win in the games they play with their targets.
It does not matter to the group that the targets are not playing a game.
It does not matter whether the target even knows what is going on around him.
It is most important that other group members know what they are doing.
II.This is their entertainment(45)
III.This is an addiction: (15)
Many become addicted to it.
It fulfills some of their human needs (see above).
IV.This is an obsession:
Groups are obsessed with every aspect of their target's lives. (37)
They spend considerable time describing to one another, what they did, and the target's reaction, although it may not be true. (43)
V.These groups are cults: (37)
Groups are introverted - their interaction with one another is more important than their interaction with a target. (36)
Back to Top
10. Who do groups target?(18-19)
For hire by cheating mate, trustee disputes, revenge service.
Public officials (including local politicians and bureaucrats), IRS agents, Treasury agents.
Activists of all kinds, but especially civil rights activists.
Whistleblowers
Abortion workers
Identity or white supremacist groups target:
Gay people
African Americans and
Jewish people
Public officials, including Police officers, who have been accused of wrongdoing.
Those in the media, including radio, television and publishing, especially those who are Jewish and those with fame, but not enough money to isolate themselves from these groups.
Immigrants
Groups typically target any judge presiding over the trial of one of their members.
Groups also attack targets of convenience. These people are selected because they are convenient targets, and not for any other reason. These include loners who tend to be more vulnerable to their harassment tactics than those with family and friends around them. Targets of convenience are used to for practice.
Sexual predators, whose names, addresses and photos are public information which is available on government websites.
In small towns, where extremist groups can actually have some power, they also target new people in town who don't know anyone. The attitude of the extremists is that they control their areas and unknown people can't be trusted.
Animal rights activists stalk those who own fur ranches, furriers, research scientists working in the field of biomedical research using animals, executives of McDonalds, etc.
Eco-terrorists target politicians, loggers, etc.
Groups normally also attack the family, friends, and associates of a target and even the businesses he patronizes.
Back to Top
11. What purpose does the target serve to the group?(24)
All targets are important in terms of:
rallying groups (i.e. “winning” the game),
providing activities,
recruiting new members,
keeping existing members in line (by example),
making a statement to the community.
Some are a source of financial revenue.
Back to Top
12. How are targets identified? (16)
Broadcasts on right wing radio stations
Internet
Print articles
Public meetings
The group members are not acting under the direct orders of anyone – i.e. leaders identify targets, but it is up to followers to decide what to do about them.
Back to Top
13. What are the group’s objectives?
To harass the target constantly. (32)
To provoke any reaction. (43)
To make sure the target knows he is being watched (also known as ”sensitizing” the target). (32)
To try and find ways of making the target interact with them (regardless of whether a target is taking the garbage out in the morning, driving to work or sitting in a local coffee shop).
Ideally, a target will not be able to go anywhere in public without having to deal with them in some way. (37)
To destroy a person’s life by attacking the weakest point, which could include a spouse, children or elderly relatives. (47)
Back to Top
14. How do they achieve their objectives?
Many tactics are tried and the result is observed. (32)
Those which evoke a response from the target are repeated. (32)
They discuss among themselves whether or not the target has been sensitized (i.e. made aware of the stalkers). (43)
Back to Top
15. How long does it last?(19)
Most individuals remain targets for several years.
Those involved in activism of any kind are life long targets.
Moving will not usually help a target. If he is a target in one area, he will remain a target where ever he moves.
Back to Top
16. How do the groups sensitize the target?
Picture taking (32)
Filming (32)
Note taking (32)
Having uniquely marked vehicles follow the target wherever he drives, without the frequent trade-offs which are normally used. (43)
Having that same vehicle parked in front of his house at night. (43)
Back to Top
17. What other tactics are used?
Vehicle-related tactics:
Numerous different vehicles hanging around a certain area. - true(48) -
Traveling in convoys with highbeams on. – in the beginning(31)
Drivers in convoys waving at one another. – in the beginning until sensitized(48)
Attempting to intercept the target’s vehicle at intersections. – when you are in a hurry (31)
Trying to force the target’s vehicle off the road. – when opportunity (48)
Vandalizing the target's vehicle, including: (32)
Slashing tires – mostly ice picked – making it look like a nail puncture -
Scratching paint -
Stealing license plates -
Draining the oil or antifreeze over a period of time in the hopes of destroying the engine.
Removing and then returning items, putting items in the vehicles, or taking items from the residence and putting in the vehicle or vice versa. – only after you have been sensitized ; not often
They do not usually cut brake lines or commit other acts of sabotage which would leave evidence. (45)
Face-to-face tactics:
Following a target on foot wherever he goes. – almost always (32)
Standing around a target while he is paying for a purchase in a store. - sometimes (35)
Swarming the target – i.e. totally surrounding a target so he cannot move. – when they know you are in a hurry (33)
Physically intimidating a target by standing very close. – in the beginning(33)
Sitting near a target in a restaurant. – in the beginning(35)
Glaring at the target . trying to sensitize the person to feel watched or treatened (48)
When a target sits anywhere in public, group members will attempt to sit behind him in order to create noise, by whatever means, including tapping their feet on the target's chair, trying to communicate with the target, may ask the target about someone or something the target knows. (32)
Walking by a target and doing strange things to attract his attention, such as: (37)
Blinking their eyes.
Reading the time from an imaginary watch on their wrist.
Making faces.
Asking something personal that the target is uncomfortable about.
Noise Campaigns:
Generating noise around the clock. In the beginning (42)
Interfering with sleep patterns (i.e. through excessive noise).(42) Trying to wake up the target at night as many times as they can.
Noise campaigns include:
People yelling and screaming outside the person’s residence. –true (33) -
Numerous different vehicles, squealing their tires, honking their horns and hanging around a certain area.
Just drive-by 90% of the time after victim has been sensitized with similar act but with harassment activities. (48)
Apartment noise campaigns will include: (33)
Tapping on the walls in the middle of the night - maybe
Taps running - maybe
Hammering – maybe – making noise in coordinate with some activities done by the victim – say leaving the house; this is to let the victim know that he/she is being watched. Everything done is to make sure the victim knows he is being watched. - true
Noises coming from the upper and/or lower apartments, and possibly the apartments on both sides
Ideally, noises are timed to activities of the target, such as: (42)
When a target goes outside. (33)
When a target flushes the toilet. (37)
When a target turns on a water faucet. (37)
When a target walks near a window. (42)
Other tactics:
Controlling the target’s time, including:(42)
Speeding across town in a convoy of vehicles so group members can stand in line ahead of a target for the sole purpose of trying to keep him waiting as long as possible. (37/42)
Blocking a target from leaving a parking space. (42)
Controlling a target’s speed on a highway by surrounding him with slow moving vehicles. (42/45)
Causing problems which force the target to solve them, like gluing his car doors shut. (45)
Creating a puzzle for the target to solve. The target is invited to waste his time following bogus clues and leads. (45)
Imposing a system of rewards and punishments on a target for: (42)
Communicating and associating with other people.
Laughing at or assaulting group members.
Causing problems with telephone services (and other utilities). (48)
Sometimes audio bugs are installed in the residence of a target. (30)
Back to Top
18. More on occupying a target’s time:
Turning the tables around on a group, by following one of their vehicles, for example, is precisely what they want. Chasing it is even better. If they can occupy a target's time that way, they will have a very successful day. They are on patrol. It is not possible to waste their time. As always, a target risks having criminal charges filed against him and there will be more than enough witnesses. (45)
Property must be secured, but a target cannot let a group control his time. He must also realize that he cannot control their time. (46)
Back to Top
19. Audio Surveillance: (30)
Groups will sometimes install audio bugs in the residence of a target. Typically, they use inexpensive bugs which broadcast on a frequency which can be monitored by other group members using scanners. Expensive bugs are reserved for high level targets.
If they do install a bug, group members will be able to listen to the target inside his home. Typically they use low power bugs, which do not broadcast very far, so they don't attract too much attention.
They will also monitor frequencies used by baby monitors, wireless intercoms, etc. If they are able to, they will also monitor cell phone conversations. Conventional scanners can be used to listen to conversations conducted on older cordless phones and 800 and 900 MHz. cell phones. Digital scanners are available from Canada and Mexico which can be used to eavesdrop on the conversations of newer cell phones. Only one side of the conversation is heard on a frequency. New cell phones change their broadcast frequencies frequently, which leaves gaps in the conversation, for those who are listening.
Back to Top
20. Some Important Points:
The primary targets of all these tactics are the group members, not the target. The group members are the ones who are programmed. Group leaders define reality for their members, so it doesn't matter if tactics do not work on a target.
Group members are sensitized to all the tactics they employ. (42)
Stalking various targets is only part of the activity of these groups. Members are trained to perform a variety of activities without question. They do not know the objectives of their leaders. (51)
Those targeted for harassment will have no problem concluding that someone is after them, but most never know who it is. (43)
Back to Top
21. What about the Police?
Groups have no respect for the law or for those who enforce it. (45)
They consider themselves to be superior to the Police, partially because of the crimes they get away with. (45)
Groups take pride that they never quit. Actually, they do, but it takes a long intensive effort by the Police. (45)
In small towns, the number of members in these groups can easily exceed the number of Police officers. (48)
Groups claim that they have the support of some Police officers. If so, it is not many. (50)
Most Police officers, except those in the South, are not familiar with the way groups operate. (50)
In general, the Police will not talk about stalking groups. (48)
One officer did say that there is a storm brewing as groups become larger and more numerous. (48)
When approaching the police, it is necessary to speak with officers who handle extremist groups. (50)
Back to Top
22. The Use of “Coercive Persuasion” to control cult members
Coercion is defined as, "to restrain or constrain by force...". Legally it often implies the use of physical force, or physical or legal threat. This traditional concept of coercion is far better understood than the technological concepts of "coercive persuasion" which are effective restraining, impairing, or compelling through the gradual application of psychological forces. (37)
Over time, coercive persuasion, a psychological force akin in some ways to our legal concepts of undue influence, can be even more effective than pain, torture, drugs, and use of physical force and legal threats. (38)
With coercive persuasion you can change people's attitudes without their knowledge and volition. (38)
The advances in the extreme anxiety and emotional stress production technologies found in coercive persuasion supersede old style coercion that focuses on pain, torture, drugs, or threat in that these older systems do not change attitude so that subjects follow orders "willingly." Coercive persuasion changes both attitude and behavior, not just behavior. (38)
Coercive persuasion, or thought reform as it is also known, is best understood as a coordinated system of graduated coercive influence and behavior controls designed to deceptively and surreptitiously manipulate and influence individuals, usually in a group setting, in order for the originators of the program to profit in some way, normally financially or politically. (38)
Using rewards and punishments, efforts are made to establish considerable control over a person's social environment, time, and sources of social support. Social isolation is promoted. (38)
Non-physical punishments are used to create strong aversive emotional arousals, such as: (39)
intense humiliation
loss of privilege
social isolation
social status changes
intense guilt
anxiety
manipulation
Back to Top
23. Internet Newsgroups/Forums:
There are Internet newsgroups which cater to stalking victims. These groups are heavily populated with members of extremist groups. They pose as victims. Their posts relate to the latest hi-tech weapons, and information about how they are being used against them. A victim should not confide in the people in these groups because the information they provide will be used to enhance the attack against them.(50)
Back to Top
24. U.S. Department of Justice defines “Vengeance/Terrorism Stalking”
The following definition is taken from Chapter 22 in the 1999 National Victim Assistance Academy Text. The complete volume is available at the Department of Justice website (www.usdoj.gov):
http://www.ojp.gov/ovc/assist/nvaa99/chap21-2.htm
Chapter 21 Special Topics
Section 2, Stalking
Categories of Stalking:
VENGEANCE/TERRORISM STALKING
The final stalking category is fundamentally different from the other three. Vengeance stalkers do not seek a personal relationship with their targets. Rather, vengeance/terrorist stalkers attempt to elicit a particular response or a change of behavior from their victims. When vengeance is their prime motive, stalkers seek only to punish their victims for some wrong they perceive the victim has visited upon them. In other words, they use stalking as a means to "get even" with their enemies.
The most common scenario in this category involves employees who stalk employers after being fired from their job. Invariably, the employee believes that their dismissal was unjustified and that their employer or supervisor was responsible for unjust treatment. One bizarre variation on this pattern is the case of a scout master who was dismissed for inappropriate conduct and subsequently decided to stalk his entire former scout troop - scouts and scout leaders alike.
A second type of vengeance or terrorist stalker, the political stalker, has motivations that parallel those of more traditional terrorists. That is, stalking is a weapon of terror used to accomplish a political agenda. Utilizing the threat of violence to force the stalking target to engage in or refrain from engaging in particular activity. For example, most prosecutions in this stalking category have been against anti-abortionists who stalk doctors in an attempt to discourage the performance of abortions.
****************************************************************************************************************************
Summary by student at CCSF:
The so called gang stalking – harassment groups are mainly for hire by people with connections; mainly private investigators.
Also research related topic; These group members mainly act in-concert to harass the victim, conspiracy amount those who hire the group with the intent to destroy.
Some illegal activities done by these groups in real estate:
1.Fraudulently fill vacant units of apartment building before an appraisal or sales.
2.Fraudulently produce documents to support / mislead stated income loan application.
3.Create a false atmosphere for a quick sale either better or worse than normal.
Google; “mistress, in-concert, conspiracy, intent”
News about P.I.’s criminal activities;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/16/anita-busch-journalist-th_n_102204.html : Anita Busch L.A. Times reporter
http://patterico.com/2008/12/15/pellicano-sentenced-to-15-years-in-prison-read-anita-buschs-sentencing-statement-including-her-commentary-on-the-los-angeles-times/
****** Taken out from the above link *****************************
You and your employers not only used fear and intimidation, but you made sure people – your targets – were smeared in the press. And you and your clients used any means at your disposal to destroy people’s employment. And you guys did it many times over many years. When it was my turn how very convenient it was for you that you already had long established relationships inside my employer.
The day after the first threat, the lawyer at the L.A. Times, Karlene Goller, wanted YOU on board to help because as she said, “He’s done work for us in the past and he’s done well by us.” The editor told her no, but she did it anyway. Without my knowledge or the knowledge of law enforcement, she had reporter Chuck Philips call you about my case. Philips had a longtime relationship with you as a news source and had worked for years alongside Karlene’s husband.
I was new to the paper, but you weren’t. And you USED the relationships you had there against me. You made sure my newspaper didn’t believe me so behind the scenes you could ruin my employment just like you and your clients did to other victims.
The day you were arrested, that’s when the cover-up began at my newspaper. To this day their own reporters, editors and readers don’t know the truth. And while you and your lawyers cried crocodile tears about media leaks, Philips – a reporter you helped for years – wrote story after story against the government’s case. Information FED to him by your defense team. And because the men whose job it was to put an end to your criminal activity were now your targets – Dan Saunders and Stan Ornellas – your pal Philips wrote stories smearing their integrity.
http://dhd.westword.com/garry-shandlings-testimony-at-pellicano-trial/
1.Garry Shandling has courage.
Imagine realizing that an off duty police officer has been hired to smear you. You’d be intimidated, maybe even worry he’d plant drugs or smear you to neighbors by simply asking them implicating questions. You might even shut up and drop your embarrassing law suit.
In most major cities police are 100% banned from working part time for private investigators or security firms because it inevitably leads to corruption. Not so in LA.
** CONCLUSION : THESE EVENTS ARE USUALLY DONE BY PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS ON BEHALF OF THEIR CLIENTS TO DESTROY THE SUBJECT FOR GAIN; FINANCIAL, SOCIAL, ETC. A LOT OF CASES INVOLVES;
PERSONAL: DIVORCE, MISTRESS PROTECTION, FAMILY TRUSTEE DISPUTES, ETC
BUSINESS: REAL ESTATE AND SERVICE TYPE BUSINESS ARE ESPECIALLY SENSITIVE TO SUCH ATTACKS AND DISINFORMATION. GROUPS HAVE KNOWN TO LIE AND ATTACK ABOUT NEW PRODUCT THE VICTIM IS TRYING TO SELL..ETC.
Eleanor White's Review of "Terrorist Stalking in America"
www.c-a-t-c-h.ca
www.gangstalking.ca
www.eharassment.ca
The popular comment layout is common, so it is easily recognized when scanning to post a comment. If the comment section is in a different format, then I am going to spend more time trying to decipher what everything means.
internet work parttime
Post a Comment